forgejo

History

silverwind c3098076b5 Switch from jest to vitest (#21444 ) Even if we are not bundling with `vite` yet, we can use `vitest` in place of Jest which brings a few benefits like not requiring to use `NODE_OPTIONS` to run and having sane module resolution. It's possible to also use `jest-extended` with vitest, but I opted to not do so for now because it brings heavyweight dependencies and it was trivial to just rewrite the affected matchers to be compatible. This PR also removes 153 JS dependencies, which is certainly nice. Co-authored-by: 6543 <6543@obermui.de> Co-authored-by: wxiaoguang <wxiaoguang@gmail.com>	2 years ago
..
setup.js	Switch from jest to vitest (#21444 )	2 years ago

Even if we are not bundling with `vite` yet, we can use `vitest` in
place of Jest which brings a few benefits like not requiring to use
`NODE_OPTIONS` to run and having sane module resolution.

It's possible to also use `jest-extended` with vitest, but I opted to
not do so for now because it brings heavyweight dependencies and it was
trivial to just rewrite the affected matchers to be compatible.

This PR also removes 153 JS dependencies, which is certainly nice.

Co-authored-by: 6543 <6543@obermui.de>
Co-authored-by: wxiaoguang <wxiaoguang@gmail.com>

setup.js

Switch from jest to vitest (#21444 )